How have the courts treated evidence of inappropriate clothing in a sexual assault trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Sayyid-El, 2d Crim. No. B235608 (Cal. App. 2013):

The People claim that the nature of this evidence was not comparatively offensive to jurors given the egregious nature of the evidence about his offenses. We agree. The relatively innocuous evidence about the clothing "paled in comparison to the testimony" of the witnesses who testified against him regarding his sexual offenses. (People v. Doolin, supra, 45 Cal.4th at p. 439.)

Other Questions


For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, how have the courts dealt with claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, what is the test for a plaintiff's claim that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated allegations of sexual assault in sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the absence of evidence of consent in a sexual assault trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed a trial court's ruling on the hearsay nature of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on discretion of a trial court in assessing the probative value of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.