How have the courts treated an evidentiary objection to each other's evidence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Jones Mem'l United Methodist Church, Inc. v. Jones Mem'l Homes, Inc., A145711 (Cal. App. 2017):
5. In the trial court, the parties presented a litany of objections to each other's evidence. As far as we can tell, the trial court did not rule on the objections. Therefore, we deem them all overruled. (Reid v. Google, Inc. (2010) 50 Cal.4th 512, 534.) The parties have not raised their evidentiary objections as issues on this appeal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence that a student was treated radically different than others in a similar situation? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated evidence in the context of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated evidence of bad faith destruction of exculpatory evidence on appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's claim that counsel failed to object to the trial court's incorrect belief that he had expressed no remorse at his initial sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated evidentiary objections for abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
