The following excerpt is from Altamore v. Barrios-Paoli, 660 N.Y.S.2d 834, 683 N.E.2d 740, 90 N.Y.2d 378 (N.Y. 1997):
In this case, the sole allegation of arbitrariness or bad faith is petitioners' wholly conclusory assertion, unsupported by any factual contentions, that in letting the 7022 list expire at the end of its intended effective extension period, the Director was motivated by a desire to allow firefighter appointments to be made from the more recently administered examination whose scoring reflected a New York City residency credit. This allegation is insufficient to overcome "the presumption of regularity and honest motivation which attaches to official acts" (Matter of Roske v. Keyes, supra, 46 A.D.2d, at 368, 363 N.Y.S.2d 21).
Page 839
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.