How have the courts resolved the issue of reliance and misrepresentation of material facts?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Radinsky v. T. W. Thomas, Inc., 264 Cal.App.2d 75, 70 Cal.Rptr. 150 (Cal. App. 1968):
The issue of reliance is no less a question of fact than the question whether there were misrepresentations of material facts, so the court's resolution of conflicting evidence upon this point is equally as conclusive upon this reviewing court as are the findings that misrepresentations were made by appellant. (Vogelsang v. Wolpert, supra, 227 Cal.App.2d at p. 109, 38 Cal.Rptr. 440.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How does the Court determine whether a triable issue of material fact exists? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Are there any material issues that have not been found to be material issues? (California, United States of America)
How does the court determine whether a triable issue of material fact exists? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)
Does this court have jurisdiction to review or overturn a preliminary injunction issued by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a finding of fact is challenged on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have any power to substitute its conclusions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object to the trial court's decision to conduct voir dire in open court preserve the issue for appeal? (California, United States of America)
In the absence of a decision by the California Supreme Court on the issue of consent for searches and seizures, what is the effect of the consent process in the context of this issue? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of good faith showing in a motion where a witness has absconded from court? (California, United States of America)
