How have the courts interpreted the standard reasonable doubt instruction in a motor vehicle accident case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Oliver, A135429 (Cal. App. 2014):
Defendant's argues that the trial court erred because it did not make a requested modification of the standard reasonable doubt instruction. This argument was rejected in People v. Farley (2009) 46 Cal.4th 1053, 1123, and we do so here as well.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "accident" as an instruction in a motor vehicle case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Penal Code instruction in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the reasonable doubt standard in a motor vehicle case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted instructions in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury's failure to give an instruction in a motor vehicle accident case harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted an instruction in a motor vehicle accident case in which a defendant was ordered to stop at a crosswalk? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt" in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the error in the form used in the on or around verdict form in a motor vehicle accident case constitute a harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
