How have the courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a witness in a criminal case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hinds, 154 Cal.App.3d 222, 201 Cal.Rptr. 104 (Cal. App. 1984):
The record shows without contradiction numerous Miranda violations which tainted the entire interrogation. As discussed below, introduction of appellant's taped confession at trial was reversible error per se. (See People v. McClary, supra, 20 Cal.3d 218, 230, 142 Cal.Rptr. 163, 571 P.2d 620.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the Miranda rights of a minor who, as a minor, waived his Miranda right to be arrested? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a case where a confession was obtained in violation of the Miranda Rule? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda rights in this context? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights in the context of criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law supporting a defendant's contention that the trial court violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses in the witness box? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a plaintiff in her civil case? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court interpret the testimony of accomplices as witnesses in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
