How have the courts interpreted the language in an agreement between a hospital and a residential developer?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Guerra v. Long Beach Care Ctr., Inc., B257157 (Cal. App. 2015):
Absent evidence of any discussion between the parties about class actions, we deduce their intent from the language in the Agreement. (Nelsen v. Legacy Partners Residential, Inc. (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1129.) It reads, "the 'Facility' and I agree
Page 11
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a forum selection clause in an agreement between a franchiser and the franchiser-signator to the agreement? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the language in a marriage agreement where the husband's claim is that he is entitled to a family allowance? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted plea agreements where a defendant's plea agreement states that he should receive a jail sentence based on his criminal conviction rather than that set forth in the criminal plea form? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted italicized language in the statute of limitations where a plaintiff has filed a claim in a different court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a waiver agreement where the waiver agreement was ambiguous or ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted an Agreement of Agreement of easement? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the language of the majority opinion in a motion that reverses the trial court's judgment that proxies cannot be used in the election of directors? (California, United States of America)
How have appellate courts interpreted the language of the interpreter at trial? (California, United States of America)
