How have the courts interpreted the intent element of attempted murder?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Markarian, 204 Cal.App.3d 52, 237 Cal.Rptr. 707 (Cal. App. 1987):

The People concede the court erred in its instructions on the intent element of attempted murder. On re-trial the court must exercise care to instruct the jury attempted murder is a specific intent offense requiring express malice. (See People v. Young, (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 891, 909-910, 234 Cal.Rptr. 819.)

Other Questions


Does a juvenile court convicted minor of attempted second degree murder, not just attempted murder, but also of premeditated attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted instructions regarding intent to kill as an element of an attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
Does the statutory elements of conspiracy to commit murder include all of the elements of attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of concurrent intent in an attempted murder case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the doctrine of concurrent intent in the context of an attempted murder case? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court have a duty to give an instruction that the prosecution substantially relies on circumstantial evidence to establish any element of the crime including the element of intent? (California, United States of America)
What is the applicable section of section 186.22(b)(1)(C) of the California Criminal Code for the attempted murder of a man who was convicted of the crime of attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant charged with the murder or attempted murder of an intended target also be convicted of the murder of other, nontargeted persons? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court have a duty to instruct the jury as to the elements of first degree murder and the required mens rea for first-degree murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.