How have the courts interpreted the findings of Reynolds v. Sims and its progeny?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Garza v. County of Los Angeles, 918 F.2d 763 (9th Cir. 1991):
This is a fascinating case. It poses many new questions which required the district court to sail into uncharted waters. For the most part, the district court--and the majority--got it right. But close is not close enough when important constitutional rights are at stake. I would order a limited remand for the district court to apply the teachings of Reynolds v. Sims and its progeny.
1 The relevant findings with regard to the 1959 Redistricting are as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a bankruptcy court's findings of fact and conclusions of law de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal district court in the case of Carter v McCarthy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the basis for a federal district court's finding that a state court transcript is sufficient basis for the district court to grant a motion requiring an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a diversity action brought by the California Board of Directors, how have the courts interpreted the findings of the federal district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of a federal court in a case brought by a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a court finds that a sanction imposed by a district court was an abuse of power, does the court have any authority to determine whether the sanction was abused or abused? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
