How have the courts interpreted the facts of the trial court's orders?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ragsdale, F071852 (Cal. App. 2018):
of the trial court's orders are undisputed and correct. (See People v. Duff (2014) 58 Cal.4th 527, 550, fn. 9 [arguments not raised in opening brief are waived]; People v. Wiley (1995) 9 Cal.4th 580, 592, fn. 7 [presumption of correctness].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How will the Court of Appeal interpret the implied findings of fact made by a trial court in support of an order? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the trial court would have exercised its discretion not to award a motion for damages even if the trial judge was aware of the fact that the motion was being brought before the court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing an order denying a motion to suppress, does the court have any authority to review the fact finding of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
When a fee order under review is ordered by a judge other than the trial judge, does the court have any discretion or authority to review the order? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to order an order affecting a judgment from the trial court while the appeal is pending? (California, United States of America)
How does the clerk of the court remit to the trial court a copy of the judgment or order of the reviewing court? (California, United States of America)
