How have the courts interpreted the evidentiary rulings of a trial court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Nijmeh v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co., B282396 (Cal. App. 2019):
We conclude the trial court's evidentiary rulings were not erroneous, whether we review those rulings for abuse of discretion or de novo. (See Reid v. Google, Inc. (2010) 50 Cal.4th 512, 535 ["we need not decide generally whether a trial court's
Page 17
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed the evidentiary rulings of a trial court? (California, United States of America)
What are the evidentiary rulings of the trial court for abuse of evidentiary evidence? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal interpret the evidentiary rulings of the Superior Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
What analysis is required for our review of the trial court's rulings on evidentiary objections? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court ruling that resolves conflicts in the evidence entitled to greater deference from a reviewing court than a similar finding in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)
