How have the courts interpreted section 2189 of the Penal Law?
"New York", United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hilt, 199 Misc. 886 (N.Y. Dist. Ct. 1951):
This court, however, feels no constraint to follow them. Upon examination of these authorities it appears that all have been decided in the second department and all recognize People v. Lieberman (248 App. Div. 602, affd. 273 N.Y. 524, supra) as authority for an interpretation of section 2189 of the Penal Law common only to that department.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted section 56(2) of the Income Tax Code in the context of Section 56(1) and Section 5(2)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When a final judgment from one district court is registered with another district court pursuant to Section 1963, is it treated like a judgment from the other district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted Section 605.05.6(1) of the Criminal Code and what are the exceptions to the section? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted Section 504(1) of the 504(2) and what is the test to establish a violation of that section? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to compel the Court to dismiss a motion alleging that a judge has improperly interpreted the interpretation of a statutory interpretation of an administrative determination? ("New York", United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted a new section of section 2251(a) of the Child Pornography Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of Section 33 of the O.S.O.A.C.L.B.O., or, if any, how have courts interpreted the relevant provisions in the Equal Access Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure and section 529 of the Criminal Procedure? ("New York", United States of America)
