How have the courts interpreted a plea agreement?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Moser, In re, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 723, 6 Cal.4th 342, 862 P.2d 723 (Cal. 1993):

Santobello v. New York, supra, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, by contrast, illustrates the circumstances that give rise to a violation of a plea agreement. In Santobello, the defendant, after having been indicted for participating in various gambling activities, entered into plea negotiations with the local prosecutor. Following these negotiations, the prosecutor agreed to permit the defendant to plead guilty to a lesser offense, which carried a maximum prison sentence of one year, and the prosecutor further agreed to make no recommendation regarding the sentence. Numerous delays ensued and, by the date set for sentencing, another prosecutor had replaced the prosecutor who had negotiated the plea agreement. The new prosecutor recommended to the sentencing court that the defendant receive the maximum, one-year sentence. Defense counsel interposed an objection, citing the promise made on behalf of the state by the initial prosecutor, prior to the

Page 732

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted an Agreement of Agreement of easement? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted plea agreements where a defendant's plea agreement states that he should receive a jail sentence based on his criminal conviction rather than that set forth in the criminal plea form? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a forum selection clause in an agreement between a franchiser and the franchiser-signator to the agreement? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a waiver agreement where the waiver agreement was ambiguous or ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to appoint a court-appointed interpreter for an indigent, non-English speaking litigant in a civil small claims proceeding? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted or interpreted the word "or" and "and" in legislation? (California, United States of America)
Does a court-appointed interpreter have to be an interpreter for an indigent plaintiff in a small claims action? (California, United States of America)
Can a defense interpreter only interpret words of the witness interpreter at trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.