How have the courts dealt with the issue of restitution in the juvenile court?

Initially, we find that R.Q. has forfeited this issue and may not raise it for the first time on appeal. (People v. McCullough (2013) 56 Cal.4th 589, 593.) While the defense objected to the restitution order in the juvenile court on the ground that R.Q. should not be responsible for Jha's personal property because the items were not in the car when R.Q. purchased it, the defense did not object on the ground that the juvenile court should have apportioned fault to Jha for his losses. "Ordinarily, a criminal defendant who does

Page 5