California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Richards, B232300 (Cal. App. 2012):
This case is distinguishable from People v. Jimenez (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 75, cited by defendant, in which there was essentially no testimony as to the handling of swabs taken from the defendant by the police department or as to the transfer of the evidence to the Department of Justice for analysis. The court found "[t]he woefully inadequate chain of custody here raises grave concerns about whether the reference sample with which the criminalist compared the [evidence collected at the scene of the crime] came from [the defendant's] cheek or from some altogether different source with no connection to him at all." (Id. at p. 81.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.