How have the courts dealt with the forfeiture of a defendant's Miranda rights argument?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Resendez, B265315 (Cal. App. 2016):

Miranda rights. Defendant forfeited this argument because he did not seek to suppress the statement on that basis below. (See People v. Scott (2011) 52 Cal.4th 452, 482; People v. Holt (1997) 15 Cal.4th 619, 667.) Defendant seeks to avoid forfeiture by arguing that his counsel was constitutionally ineffective by neglecting to raise this issue in the trial court. We conclude that counsel did not render deficient performance because no Miranda warnings were required.

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant in a case where a confession was obtained in violation of the Miranda Rule? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who is read his Miranda rights knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive their right to remain silent have knowingly waived their rights? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the Miranda Miranda Miranda rights in this context? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant who assaulted another defendant with a chain? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion to strike a defendant's application to appeal against the court's order that defendant pay fees and fines? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a claim that the Miranda rights were violated, how have courts reviewed the evidence in the context of Miranda rights claims? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the Miranda rights of a minor who, as a minor, waived his Miranda right to be arrested? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights of a defendant's Miranda waiver? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.