How have the courts dealt with a motion to suppress evidence recovered from a police search warrant?

Price moved to suppress the evidence recovered following his arrest, arguing that the warrantless entry violated the Fourth Amendment. The district court denied the motion. See United States v. Price, No. 17-CR-301, 2017 WL 4838307 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2017). Price was tried, convicted, and sentenced. He now appeals, contesting the district court's denial of his motion to suppress, and arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues on appeal.

Page 3