The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Curtis, 568 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1978):
4 For some period, we followed the so-called Massachusetts procedure for allocating the judge and jury's functions in resolving a voluntariness attack. By this procedure, "the jury passes on voluntariness, pursuant to a proper instruction, after the judge has fully and independently resolved the issue of voluntariness against the accused." Kear v. United States, 369 F.2d 78, 84 (9th Cir. 1966). Thus, once the trial judge concluded that the statement was voluntary, the evidence pertaining to this issue was placed before the jury. The jury was then instructed not to consider the statement unless it concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that it had been voluntarily given.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.