How have sections 654, 654 and 654 sections of the California Criminal Code been interpreted?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Phillips, E055742 (Cal. App. 2013):
Section 654, subdivision (a), provides: "An act or omission that is punishable in different ways by different provisions of law shall be punished under the provision that provides for the longest potential term of imprisonment, but in no case shall the act or omission be punished under more than one provision." We apply the substantial evidence standard of review. (People v. McCoy (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1338.)
Page 7
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is convicted of a sex offence under both sections of the S. 654(1) and (2) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 654(1) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have sections 424, subdivision 1 and 425 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of Section 424(1) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667.6 of the California Criminal Code (c) of Section 654 of the Criminal Code apply to a burglary conviction? (California, United States of America)
