How have rules of procedure and evidence been interpreted in a civil case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Mahmood, F066162 (Cal. App. 2014):
That said, the right of confrontation is not absolute. In the exercise of this right, the accused and the state must each comply with rules of procedure and evidence intended to assure that the jury's ultimate determination is fair and reliable. (People v. Ardoin, supra, 196 Cal.App.4th at p. 118.) A proper application of rules of evidence does not impermissibly infringe on a defendant's due process rights. (Id. at pp. 119, 122.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How has section 831.2 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure been interpreted in this case? (California, United States of America)
Does a common law rule barring the admission of hearsay evidence in a civil case affect the reliability of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the common law rule barring the admission of hearsay evidence in a civil case affect the reliability of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
How has the exclusion of evidence in a civil case concerning the cooperation of a witness in the trial of a defendant in an assault case been interpreted? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 352 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Guidelines on the exclusion of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpretation of the California Code of Civil Procedure when it comes to the interpretation of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
