How have jury instructions been interpreted in criminal cases?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mason, D064039 (Cal. App. 2015):

In any event, jury instructions are not considered in isolation, and their adequacy is determined by consideration of the entire charge to the jury. (People v. Holt (1997) 15 Cal.4th 619, 677.) The jury instructions as given covered the nature of the required agreement between the codefendants, or other unknown individuals, to commit the crime of giving a controlled substance to a person in custody. The jury was told to decide each charge separately, and it filled out five separate verdict forms on the conspiracy charges. The instructions adequately presented the issue of how many conspiracies were represented in the evidence, without any need for an additional sua sponte instruction.

Other Questions


Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the instruction in the context of a jury instruction in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How has Section 654 of the California Penal Code been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have instructions been interpreted in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How have the voir dire questions in a criminal case been interpreted by the trial court and the prosecutor in this case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have any authority or authority to instruct a jury to disregard an instruction in an assault case where the instruction had no antecedent in the facts? (California, United States of America)
Does a party have to complain to the Court on appeal that an instruction in a criminal case instructing a jury to convict a defendant of possessing all six firearms was "too general or incomplete"? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.