How have instructions been interpreted in a jury trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jiles, B224074 (Cal. App. 2011):
We presume the jury followed the court's instructions. (People v. Boyette, supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. 436.) Appellant's argument that the presumption should not apply as there were 130 pages of instructions is unconvincing. To the extent some of the prosecutor's comment on concurrent intent was not accurate, the jury was instructed pursuant to CALJIC No. 1.00 to follow the instructions not argument.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury in a case, what is the test for interpreting the instructions as a whole? (California, United States of America)
Is it instructional error to instruct a jury in a trial trial on a defense that is not relevant to the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted counsel's arguments in a trial where the jury was instructed to follow the instructions? (California, United States of America)
When a jury is asked to interpret the jury instructions in a civil trial, what are the consequences if the instructions are claimed to be conflicting or ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defense interpreter only interpret words of the witness interpreter at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that a trial court prejudicially errs in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte at the penalty phase to disregard the no-sympathy instruction at the guilt phase? (California, United States of America)
