How have courts used the presumption of abstention doctrine to withhold review of a pending petition?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Lavery v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., No. 1:20-cv-00948-NONE-JLT (HC) (E.D. Cal. 2020):

abstention doctrine (Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-54 (1971)) as another basis to withhold review of the pending petition, finding some ambiguity as to whether petitioner had been convicted of a crime at the time the magistrate judge received the petition, based on the dates provided by petitioner therein. The findings and recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service of that order. To date, no party has filed objections.

Other Questions


If a new petition is filed before the district court without a decision having been rendered, is it construed as a motion to amend the pending petition? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a state prisoner seek review of an adverse lower court decision by filing a notice of appeal instead of filing a petition to the Court of Appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed a district court's denial of a petition for habeas corpus? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a conclusion by a state court on a mixed issue involving questions both of fact and law, does the court have to give the state court full deference? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a district court order denying bail pending resolution of a habeas petition a final decision subject to review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a factual finding from a state court relevant to the federal court review if the relevant record is unavailable for review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a district court's confirmation of an arbitral award, does the court need to review a finding of fact for "clear error"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When assessing the evidence presented at trial, does a reviewing court need to conduct a thorough review of the state court record? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court review a petition for habeas corpus by a person in custody pursuant to a state court judgment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.