How have courts treated the issue of sentencing in this case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jimenez, B283211 (Cal. App. 2019):

Appellant forfeited this sentencing issue by failing to object in the trial court on constitutional grounds. (People v. Speight (2014) 227 Cal.App.4th 1229, 1247.) Were the argument not forfeited, it nonetheless would fail on the merits.

Other Questions


When a judge's original sentencing has been struck down by the Court of Appeal, does the sentencing court have the power to impose any sentence permitted under the applicable statutes and rules on remand? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of electronic surveillance in a juvenile court case? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have to remand the case for sentencing if the trial court errs in imposing a sentence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to a reduced sentence from a sentencing court where the sentencing court was unaware of the scope of its discretionary powers? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of ineffective counsel in sentencing cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the issue of due process in death penalty cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of prosecutorial misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the role of a court in sentencing a defendant to a sentence that is within the legislatively determined limits of a criminal sentence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of vindictiveness in a case such as this? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of mistake of fact in a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.