How have courts treated the issue of child support in the context of property settlement agreements?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Estate of Vai, In re, 47 Cal.Rptr. 227 (Cal. App. 1965):

In Newman v. Burwell (1932) 216 Cal. 608, 15 P.2d 511, the contention was made that the obligation of the decedent under a property settlement agreement entered into with his wife to support their minor child constituted a purely personal obligation which terminated upon his death precluding any claim against his estate. The court referred to certain authorities including California cases and said:

Other Questions


When a child support agreement is incorporated in the child support order, does the court have a duty to exercise its discretion over child support? (California, United States of America)
How have the Courts treated the issue of "forfeasibility" in the context of the appellant's appeal against his conviction for receiving stolen property? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 43.1 of the Child Support Guidelines when determining whether a father has to support his unborn child? (California, United States of America)
Can a non-custodial parent who signed an agreement with the district attorney for child support be ordered to pay child support without the consent of the custodial parent? (California, United States of America)
Does a property settlement agreement bar a father from seeking to recover attorney's fees and costs in a child support case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of maintenance of a relationship where the maintenance agreement has for its object the securing of a divorce? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated the issue of consent in the context of a refund fraud case? (California, United States of America)
When a petition does not request child support in a case in which the court feels it should be ordered, what recourse does the court have? (California, United States of America)
Does section 7895 of the California Family Code require an appellate court to appoint counsel for a parent unable to afford counsel for their child who is a dependent child of the juvenile court? (California, United States of America)
In the absence of a decision by the California Supreme Court on the issue of consent for searches and seizures, what is the effect of the consent process in the context of this issue? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.