How have courts treated substitute counsel in a motion to substitute counsel?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Martinez, C083376 (Cal. App. 2017):
Defendant appeals. His sole contention is that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motions to substitute counsel. (People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118.) We disagree and affirm.
In view of the contention raised on appeal, we dispense with a detailed account of the facts.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of a motion to withdraw a plea of no contest and a motion for substitution of counsel based on ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for approval of a motion by the California Supreme Court on a motion to approve a motion for approval by the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a motion to substitute retained counsel before a sentencing hearing? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel when a trial court denies his motion to substitute one appointed counsel for another? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a motion to substitute a defendant's appointed counsel? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How has the court dealt with a motion to substitute counsel for a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a motion for a new trial alleging inadequacy of counsel, does the court have to appoint a new counsel? (California, United States of America)
