How have courts treated a complaint that is frivolous under section 1915(d)?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rodriguez v. State of Ariz. Dept. of Corrections, 978 F.2d 715 (9th Cir. 1992):
We review for abuse of discretion the district court's determination that a complaint is frivolous under section 1915(d). Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1730 (1992).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a final judgment from one district court is registered with another district court pursuant to Section 1963, is it treated like a judgment from the other district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a post-conviction petition is denied as untimely in the federal court, can the statute of limitations under Section 2244(d)(2) of the Criminal Code be tolled by a state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted section 56(2) of the Income Tax Code in the context of Section 56(1) and Section 5(2)? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When a plaintiff files an amended complaint, can the court use the amended complaint to clarify the allegations in the original complaint? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If plaintiff files an amended complaint in this court despite the court's indication that it would likely be subject to dismissal, can the court refer to a prior pleading? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court interpreted the principle of "due process" in the context of section 402(d)(8) of the Child Support Benefits Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a pro se plaintiff who brings a civil rights action amend his complaint after the court has entered judgment dismissing the original complaint? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a litigant claims that a lower court has taken action beyond its jurisdiction, does the court have power to require the lower court to set matters right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a state court's decision on a habeas petition does not meet the criteria set forth in Section 2254(d)? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court treated the argument that the court improperly attributed more weight to circumstantial evidence than to direct evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
