How have courts interpreted the standard of injunctive action in an obscenity case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Busch v. Projection Room Theatre, 118 Cal.Rptr. 428, 44 Cal.App.3d 111 (Cal. App. 1974):
5 These cases are collected in the opinion of Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, supra, 413 U.S. at p. 55, 93 S.Ct. at p. 2634, 37 L.Ed.2d at pp. 455-456, where it is indicated that these 'standards' are applicable to injunctive proceedings to restrain the exhibition of films on the basis of their obscenity.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the standard of proof in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
Does the court have any case law with respect to the interpretation of the law in the context of personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the voir dire questions in a criminal case been interpreted by the trial court and the prosecutor in this case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the standard jury instruction in a mental health case? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Does a court-appointed interpreter have to be an interpreter for an indigent plaintiff in a small claims action? (California, United States of America)
