How have courts interpreted the law in the context of civil litigation?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Berry, In re, 57 Cal.Rptr. 645 (Cal. App. 1967):

7 Shillitani v. United States, supra, 384 U.S. 264, 86 S.Ct. 1531; Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. (1911) 221 U.S. 418, 441, 31 S.Ct. 492, 55 L.Ed. 797.

8 Bridges v. Superior Court, supra, 14 Cal.2d at p. 476, 94 P.2d at p. 989, quoting from In re Debs (1895) 158 U.S. 564, 596, 15 S.Ct. 900, 39 L.Ed. 1092.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to appoint a court-appointed interpreter for an indigent, non-English speaking litigant in a civil small claims proceeding? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Is a city's interpretation of a section of the California Civil Code interpreted in the context of an administrative agency's interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the California Civil Code in the context of "Liberal interpretation"? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for interpreting the meaning of the word "reasonable and common sense interpretation" in the context of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does section 12022.7 of the California Code of Civil Procedure prohibit the use of language that is "controversial, offensive or offensive" in the context of civil litigation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the provisions of the California Civil Code former section 1673 in the context of restraints on business operations and commercial dealings? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.