How have courts interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment and the power of a state to tax an "emigrant agent"?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Eramdjian, 155 F. Supp. 914 (S.D. Cal. 1957):
Williams v. Fears, 1900, 179 U.S. 270, 21 S.Ct. 128, 129, 45 L.Ed. 186, involved the Fourteenth Amendment and the power of a state to tax an "emigrant agent" and whether the tax burdened interstate commerce. The tax was held proper and the court said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a state court have the authority to interpret the findings of a federal court when determining whether a federal judge has found that a state judge has jurisdiction to interpret a federal finding? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for the Fourteenth Amendment and the power of a state to tax an 'emigrant agent'? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal habeas court interfere with a state court's interpretation of state law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal court to rule on an interpretation of state law by a state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a state court's interpretation of state law bind a federal court sitting in habeas corpus? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal court grant habeas corpus relief for alleged errors in the interpretation or application of state sentencing laws by either a state trial or appellate court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment in the context of the Eighth Amendment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a state prisoner obtain federal habeas relief against a state court's finding that the state court was wrong? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a conclusion by a state court on a mixed issue involving questions both of fact and law, does the court have to give the state court full deference? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
