How have courts interpreted the doctrine of substantive due process in civil litigation?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Ms. L. v. U.S Immigration & Customs Enforcement, 310 F.Supp.3d 1133 (S.D. Cal. 2018):

County of Sacramento v. Lewis , 523 U.S. 833, 850, 118 S.Ct. 1708, 140 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1998) (stating "[r]ules of due process are not ... subject to mechanical application in unfamiliar territory.") On the contrary, "an investigation into substantive due process involves an appraisal of the totality of the circumstances rather than a formalistic examination of fixed elements[.]" Armstrong v. Squadrito , 152 F.3d 564, 570 (7th Cir. 1998).

Other Questions


How has the pleading standard been interpreted in civil civil cases in the context of civil civil litigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the scope of the federal government's interpretation of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure in the context of civil litigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the doctrine of qualified immunity been interpreted in the context of civil litigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court interpreted the doctrine of federal jurisdiction in the context of the federal courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of the word "judicial review" in the context of federal civil litigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has Section 654(b)(2) of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure been interpreted by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted time limits in civil litigation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is the interpretation of the Federal Communications Commission's interpretation of Section 5(1) of the Civil Code of Civil Procedure "irrational"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a litigant claims that a lower court has taken action beyond its jurisdiction, does the court have power to require the lower court to set matters right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.