How have courts interpreted the doctrine of presumption in support of a judgment?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Selivanov, B252894, B255166, c/w B255166 (Cal. App. 2016):
[Citation.]' [Citation.] We '"'presume in support of the judgment the existence of every fact the trier could reasonably deduce from the evidence.'" [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Clark (2011) 52 Cal.4th 856, 943.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
If the text of a ballot is ambiguous and supports multiple interpretations, how will the courts interpret it? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine? (California, United States of America)
How will the Court of Appeal interpret the implied findings of fact made by a trial court in support of an order? (California, United States of America)
When the evidence is sufficient to sustain some but not all alleged damages, when the evidence does not support all of the damages, will the court reduce the judgment to the amount supported by the evidence? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of self-defense in cases that address other legal doctrines? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 43.1 of the Child Support Guidelines when determining whether a father has to support his unborn child? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the language of the majority opinion in a motion that reverses the trial court's judgment that proxies cannot be used in the election of directors? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the doctrine of "presence and presumptions" in appellate law? (California, United States of America)
