How have courts interpreted the anti-SLAPP provisions in the context of SLAPP cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Fairwagelaw v. Heurlin, G044141 (Cal. App. 2011):
not themselves the very acts that constitute the alleged fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, or willful misconduct. "[C]ollateral allusions to protected activity should not subject the cause of action to the anti-SLAPP statute." (Martinez v. Metabolife Internal., Inc. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 181, 188.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
Does the court have any case law with respect to the interpretation of the law in the context of personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the Miranda rights in the context of criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the provisions of the California Franchise Tax Act and the California Tax Code in the context of the collection and seizure of a taxpayer's property? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the double jeopardy provisions in double jeopardy cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the case law in the context of employment law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the provisions of the California Civil Code former section 1673 in the context of restraints on business operations and commercial dealings? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance contract in the context of an arbitration? (California, United States of America)
