How have courts interpreted statutory interpretation de novo on appeal?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Khan v. Los Angeles City Employees' Ret. Sys., 113 Cal.Rptr.3d 417, 187 Cal.App.4th 98 (Cal. App. 2010):
We review issues of statutory interpretation de novo on appeal where there are no disputed factual issues. ( Alesi v. Board of Retirement (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 597, 601, 101 Cal.Rptr.2d 81.) Any interpretation of compensation that would affect retirement benefits may be applied retroactively. (See In re Retirement Cases (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 426, 443-445, 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 790.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's appeal against the Court of Appeal is based on statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
Does a judge have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the Superior Court of the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to the benefit of the Court of Appeal's Appeal of Appeal when they are not yet convicted? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant statutory reference to the "right to appeal" in the California Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory language in the context of the statutory framework? (California, United States of America)
When a court of appeal has an appealable judgment or order before it, does the court have jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify it? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of Justice on Beach's appeal against a finding that an autopsy photograph of the victim was unduly prejudicial and lacked probative value? (California, United States of America)
