How have courts interpreted statements in the past that are relevant to this matter?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Feldman v. Katz, 160 Cal.App.2d 836, 325 P.2d 597 (Cal. App. 1958):

The following statements in Weisbecker v. Weisbecker, 1945, 71 Cal.App.2d 41, 47, 161 P.2d 990, 994, also appear to be particularly apposite to the situation here presented:

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the opinion of the Court of Appeal in deciding whether a retraction was published as conspicuously as a defamatory statement? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the prosecutor's statement that the jury's verdict must be based on the evidence presented in court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted sentencing statements from the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the rules of evidence in cases dealing with self-confessed statements made outside of court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statements by a defendant to a victim that he "knew what he was doing" in the context of the shooting? (California, United States of America)
Can a defense interpreter only interpret words of the witness interpreter at trial? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted a statement of facts in a motion for class certification? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.