How have courts interpreted section 7031 of the California Code of Civil Procedure on the basis that a contractor is a "minor, incompetent and fraudulent contractor"?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis Waterpark, 218 Cal.App.3d 1507, 267 Cal.Rptr. 874 (Cal. App. 1990):
Plaintiff then relies on Asdourian v. Araj (1985) 38 Cal.3d 276, 211 Cal.Rptr. 703, 696 P.2d 95 for the proposition that the purpose of section 7031 is to protect the public from marginal, incompetent and fraudulent contractors, and that the legislature never intended to bar a just claim by a competent company dealing in California in an isolated transaction.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 150 of the California Code of Civil Procedure on the basis that a permit is not 'lawfully granted' until all administrative action with respect to the application has been completed? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 17,000 of the California Code of Civil Procedure and how have they interpreted the law? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 830.6(1) of the California Highway Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether a defendant is immune from liability under the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 125.3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure apply to the construction of the statute, and if so, does the court have jurisdiction to interpret the interpretation of the law? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 31103 of the California Code of Civil Procedure on the interpretation of the Section 31103 section? (California, United States of America)
