How have courts interpreted section 7 of the Child Support Guidelines?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from In re DAMIAN M., 109 Cal.Rptr.3d 869, 185 Cal.App.4th 1 (Cal. App. 2010):
section was interpreted in In re Jason J. (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 710, 716-717, 284 Cal.Rptr. 673 (disapproved of on another point in People v. Welch (1993) 5 Cal.4th 228, 237, 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 520, 851 P.2d 802). There the court dealt with two challenged conditions: one requiring the parents to participate with the minor in counseling and one requiring the father to participate in AA sessions. The court upheld the former condition and struck the latter.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
