How have courts interpreted section 175 of the Criminal Code with respect to an enhancement to a sentence that includes an indeterminate term?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Anderson, 35 Cal.App.4th 587, 41 Cal.Rptr.2d 474 (Cal. App. 1995):
To the extent the holding in People v. Skeirik, supra, 229 Cal.App.3d at page 468, 280 Cal.Rptr. 175 is inconsistent, we note the court there was interpreting a different statutory scheme. In Skeirik, the court held that the five-year enhancement could not be engrafted as a determinate term onto the indeterminate sentence resulting from section
Page 481
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
When the base term of a sentence has been stayed under section 654 of the Criminal Code, under what circumstances will the court change the determinate sentence for an enhancement? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
What are the reasons for a sentencing court to sentence a defendant to two consecutive terms of consecutive sentences under section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts considered section 954 of the Criminal Code when sentencing a defendant under section 654 under Section 654? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the term "currently serving a sentence" under section 1170.18, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted section 1385 of the Criminal Code with respect to criminal history? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
