How have courts interpreted section 1714 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of personal injury cases?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Leakes v. Shamoun, 187 Cal.App.3d 772, 232 Cal.Rptr. 171 (Cal. App. 1986):

The principle embodied in this code section serves as the foundation of our negligence law. (Rowland v. Christian (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108, 112, 70 Cal.Rptr. 97, 443 P.2d 561.) Any exception to the duty set forth in section 1714 involves the balancing of a number of considerations:

Other Questions


Does Section 204 of the California Labor Code, section 204(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, allow for personal injury damages to be sustained in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 139 of the California Civil Code, section 139 2 of the S.C. Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 352 of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Guidelines on the exclusion of evidence in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of section 12965, subdivision (b) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure for the purpose of paying attorney fees in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
Does the court have any case law with respect to the interpretation of the law in the context of personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.