How have courts interpreted rulings on the admissibility of evidence in limine or during trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Wong v. Erion (In re Marriage of Wong), G057019 (Cal. App. 2020):
court's rulings on the admissibility of evidence, whether made in limine or during trial, are reviewed for abuse of discretion. (People ex rel. Harris v. Sarpas (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 1539, 1555.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence in limine or during trial? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed rulings on the admissibility of evidence in limine or during trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts reviewed a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a common law rule barring the admission of hearsay evidence in a civil case affect the reliability of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for appeal against the evidentiary rulings of the trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
