How have courts interpreted privacy provisions in the past?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Bonner v. City of Santa Ana, 27 Cal.App.4th 1541, 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 233 (Cal. App. 1994):

7 After "privacy" was explicitly added to our state Constitution in 1972, Porten v. University of San Francisco (1976) 64 Cal.App.3d 825, 134 Cal.Rptr. 839 perpetuated the cause of action. The Porten court did not discuss the question of how a constitutional provision can give rise to a right to damages except to briefly note, in passing, that the privacy provision was self-executing. (64 Cal.App.3d at p. 829, 134 Cal.Rptr. 839.)

Other Questions


How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the arbitration provisions in determining whether an arbitration provision applies to a certain controversy? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a federal agency's interpretation of the California Civil Code? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the provisions of the California Civil Code former section 1673 in the context of restraints on business operations and commercial dealings? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted or interpreted the word "or" and "and" in legislation? (California, United States of America)
How has the exemption from the nondiscrimination provision of title VII been interpreted by the Court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the interpretation of a motor vehicle insurance contract in the context of an arbitration? (California, United States of America)
Can a defense interpreter only interpret words of the witness interpreter at trial? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted estoppel provisions in a life insurance policy where the insurer knew that the insured's representation concerning prior illnesses was false? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.