The following excerpt is from United States v. McReynolds, 20-10115, 20-10125 (9th Cir. 2021):
1. We review the district court's exercise of jurisdiction de novo. United States v. Gallaher, 275 F.3d 784, 788 (9th Cir. 2001). We hold that the district court had subject matter jurisdiction here. Section 922(g)(1) is a law of general applicability that makes certain actions criminal regardless of where the act is committed and regardless of who committed the act. See United States v. Young, 936 F.2d 1050, 1055 (9th Cir. 1991), overruled in part on other grounds by United States v. Vela, 624 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2010). Federal jurisdiction under the statute is predicated on the interstate transportation or shipment of a firearm.[2]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.