How have courts dealt with the issue of race discrimination in juries?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Williams v. Superior Court, 263 Cal.Rptr. 503, 49 Cal.3d 736, 781 P.2d 537 (Cal. 1989):

People v. Bell (1989) 49 Cal.3d 502, 262 Cal.Rptr. 1, 778 P.2d 129 holds a showing of substantial and continuous underrepresentation of Blacks from a county's juries is insufficient even to put the county to the burden of explaining the underrepresentation. Instead, a defendant must now point to a constitutionally impermissible aspect of the county's jury selection procedure and show that this is the cause of the racial disproportionality. Such a specific showing is beyond the resources of most, if not all, defendants. Moreover, the holding itself assumes that the county, confronted with a showing that something in its method of selecting jurors is having the effect of excluding a cognizable group, has no duty to investigate and correct the system; it may continue to exclude minorities until someone is able to prove the exact cause of the problem.

Other Questions


When a jury asks a jury a question after retiring for deliberation, does the court have a duty to provide the jury with additional instructions? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have to consider whether a jury has been instructed to disregard an instruction from the Court of Appeal that is not supported by how the jury views the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court's instructions to the jury that the jury must conclusively accept the previous jury's finding that defendant's guilt has already been decided? (California, United States of America)
What are the legal issues to be decided by the court, and factual issues to the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court's statement that it does not believe the jury is hopelessly deadlocked give the jury the impression the jury should convict defendant? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's out-of-court statement is admitted to a jury, does the court have to instruct the jury that this evidence must be viewed with caution? (California, United States of America)
When a jury has been sworn in, can the trial court reopen jury selection after the jury has already been sworn? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of good faith showing in a motion where a witness has absconded from court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the situation where the verdict form signed by the jury is different in some respect from the verdict as declared and acknowledged in open court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have the power to overturn a conviction for sexual assault on the grounds that the trial court improperly instructed the jury to consider the issue of venue? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.