How have courts dealt with the issue of collateral in a personal injury case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People By and Through Department of Public Works v. Murray, 172 Cal.App.2d 219, 342 P.2d 485 (Cal. App. 1959):
The trial court sustained respondent's objection that the matter was irrelevant and collateral. Appellant, relying on Bingaman v. City of Seattle, 139 Wash. 68, 245 P. 411; People v. Murata, 161 Cal.App.2d
Page 493
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
How have we dealt with the issue of personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
