How have courts dealt with employment applications during a criminal trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Carpenter, In re, 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 665, 889 P.2d 985, 9 Cal.4th 634 (Cal. 1995):

The first, Smith v. Phillips (1982) 455 U.S. 209, 102 S.Ct. 940, 71 L.Ed.2d 78, involved facts that in some respects are more troubling than those here. The defendant was convicted by jury of crimes in state court. During the trial, one of the actual jurors applied "for employment as a major felony investigator in the District Attorney's Office." (Id. at p. 212, 102 S.Ct. at p. 943.) When the defendant learned of this after trial, he unsuccessfully moved to set aside the verdict. The trial court found that the employment application " 'was indeed an indiscretion,' " but it did not indicate prejudice against the defendant or an inability to decide guilt or innocence " 'solely on the evidence.' " (Id. at pp. 213-214, 102 S.Ct. at pp. 944.)

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How has the case been dealt with in juvenile court and criminal court? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts reversed a judgment entered in a criminal case following a court trial? (California, United States of America)
Does section 987.8(b) of the California Criminal Code require a motion by the Court of Appeal to remand a case back to the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with errors and misconduct committed by the trial court and the prosecutor? (California, United States of America)
How has the case been dealt with in juvenile court and criminal court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.