How have courts dealt with denial of removal petitions?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from WAIS V. FARMER, No. A125250, No. A125285, No. PES-06-289350, No. PTR 08-291579 (Cal. App. 2010):
in denial of either removal petition has been both implicitly abandoned by failure to pursue it in the briefing (Lyons v. Chinese Hospital Assn. (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 1331, 1336), and expressly abandoned in the reply brief.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to deny without prejudice a habeas corpus petition from a defendant who has not filed a petition in the proper lower court? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion for reconsideration by the appellate court of the Superior Court of Appeal affect the appealability of the denial of the motion to reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of whether the court erred in denying defendant's petition? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal dealt with a motion to reverse a judgment in the Superior Court of Justice? (California, United States of America)
When a petition does not request child support in a case in which the court feels it should be ordered, what recourse does the court have? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the use of chains and stun belts in court? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of good faith showing in a motion where a witness has absconded from court? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
