How have courts dealt with a conflict between discovery procedures and the parties' constitutional rights?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Vinson v. Superior Court, 239 Cal.Rptr. 292, 43 Cal.3d 833, 740 P.2d 404 (Cal. 1987):

In Britt v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 143 Cal.Rptr. 695, 574 P.2d 766, we faced a similar conflict between discovery procedures and the parties' constitutional rights. The plaintiffs were property owners near an airport operated by the local port district. They sued the district for diminution of property values, personal injuries, and emotional disturbance brought

Page 299

Other Questions


What is the conflict between discovery procedures and the parties' constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
When an arbitration agreement requires the parties to share the costs of arbitration, does the court have jurisdiction to order that party to waive its right to arbitrate the other party's claim? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a Federal Court finding that a federal court violated a plaintiff's constitutional rights by imposing fees and fines without making a determination of his ability to pay? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts treated appellant's claim that the court deprived him of his constitutional right to due process by ordering him into placement without an adequate case plan? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)
Does a procedural error not affecting substantial rights of the parties constitute reversible error? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant requests document discovery from a third party, does the third party respond by delivering materials to the clerk of the court? (California, United States of America)
What is the meaning of "in any court whatever" in article I, section 15 of the California Constitution, which gives a party accused the right to appear and defend in person and with counsel? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.