How have courts considered the "right to control" aspect of mail fraud?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Finazzo, 850 F.3d 94 (2nd Cir. 2017):

In United States v. Wallach , 935 F.2d 445 (2d Cir. 1991), we first addressed the extent of the "right to control" aspect of mail fraud. Id. at 46263. We explained that "application of the [right to control] theory is predicated on a showing that some person or entity has been deprived of potentially valuable economic information." Id. "Thus, the withholding or inaccurate reporting of information that could impact on economic decisions can provide the basis for a mail fraud prosecution." Id. at 463.

Other Questions


When a litigant claims that a lower court has taken action beyond its jurisdiction, does the court have power to require the lower court to set matters right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, can the court consider affidavits or any other evidence properly before the court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which the federal courts have been ordered to consider the competence of the state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a criminal defendant have a constitutional right to waive his right to counsel and represent himself in court pro se? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his right to receive translation services provided by a court interpreter under the Court Interpreters Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted s. 2(e) of the Canadian Bill of Rights, s.2(e), s.3(e") of the Charter of Human Rights? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is there any case law in which a court has found that combining two criminal convictions for fraud with one criminal conviction for fraud was a reasonable chance of success? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the US Supreme Court consider whether the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court has any authority or authority to issue an opinion in the context of judicial review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant is denied the right to appear in court pro se, can he rely on the "harmless error analysis" to determine if he has ever invoked his right to self-representation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the Court considered the argument that a defendant has a constitutional right not to be punished on appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.