How have courts considered the probative and prejudicial aspects of evidence in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Sanchez, G055222 (Cal. App. 2019):

the jury. The trial court is not obliged to expressly weigh the probative and prejudicial aspects of the proffered evidence, nor is it required to state that it has done so. (People v. Lucas (1995) 12 Cal.4th 415, 448; People v. Mickey (1991) 54 Cal.3d 612, 656.)

Other Questions


For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 352 of the California Evidence Code for excluding prejudicial evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, how have the courts dealt with claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the victim's other sexual conduct? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence in the case of the alleged sexual assault of a young girl, how have the courts considered the evidence against the accused? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on discretion of a trial court in assessing the probative value of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on discretion of a trial court in assessing the probative value of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on discretion of a trial court in assessing the probative value of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.