How have courts considered Miranda warnings that do not inform a defendant of his right to consult with appointed counsel prior to questioning?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Loucious, 847 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2017):
In United States v. Noa , 443 F.2d 144 (9th Cir. 1971), we considered the sufficiency of Miranda warnings that did not inform the defendant he had the right to consult with appointed counsel prior to questioning. The defendant was presented with the following warnings in oral and written forms:
[847 F.3d 1150]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a Miranda warning that does not inform a defendant of his right to consult with appointed counsel constitute a Miranda violation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the Miranda warning that a suspect who is appointed counsel before questioning have to consult with an attorney during questioning? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts treated a defendant's right to a Miranda warning? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a court error not informing a defendant of their Miranda rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a right to discharge or substitute counsel at trial if they are not represented by appointed counsel? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant waive his Miranda rights or waive his right to counsel? ("New York", United States of America)
Does a criminal defendant have a constitutional right to waive his right to counsel and represent himself in court pro se? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant who is represented by appointed counsel or the public defender request to discharge the attorney and substitute counsel? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant is denied the right to appear in court pro se, can he rely on the "harmless error analysis" to determine if he has ever invoked his right to self-representation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant's right to a jury trial extend to the factual determination of whether that defendant has suffered a prior conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
